Basement Review Draft policy and other measures for public consultation

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

13 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Studio Indigo Ltd (Doug Indigo) 30 Jan 2013

Basement Review Draft policy and other measures for public consultation 2- Review of the Core Strategy box1 34.3.74

  • Comment ID: 190
· Construction management requirements are only useful if they are reinforced by Council – currently they are not – this applies to both large developments in the Borough like the development of the former Commonwealth Institute or individual residents. · Construction traffic can be a nuisance, particularly scaffold lorries who seem immune from parking restrictions of any kind. However the general increase in traffic has occurred over the years with particular increas
Sam Gordon Clark 30 Jan 2013

Basement Review Draft policy and other measures for public consultation 2- Review of the Core Strategy box1 34.3.74

  • Comment ID: 209
Nuisance, noise, dirt etc. This is the major area of concern for most of us, and some of the comments in the residents' survey are truly horrific. It is good that CTMPs will be more detailed, and that all the relevant information will be available up front. It was disgraceful that the proposal for spoil removal from Markham Sq was not in the public domain. However, are your staff competent to judge these matters? The proposal for vehicle access to 1, South Terrace to remove spoil was completely
Chelsea Society (Paul Lever) 16 Jan 2013

Basement Review Draft policy and other measures for public consultation 2- Review of the Core Strategy box1 34.3.74

  • Comment ID: 44
34.3.74. The phrase "taking the cumulative impacts of other development proposals into account" is too vague. It should be followed by a sentence reading; "This may mean that, particularly in the case of narrow streets, the Council will restrict the number of basement developments which can take place at any one time."
First pagePrevious page